I read a blurb in Time magazine today that says our country has the "
second highest infant mortality rate among industrialized nations," behind only Latvia. If that's not shocking to you, then you're not thinking! What the blurb did NOT mention, but I will, is that the U.S. spends MORE PER CAPITA ON HEALTCHARE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. Isn't that strange? We spend more, but get less, than any other industrialized country.
And yet we have a president who not long ago spoke of the wonders of our system of "private healthcare system." I forget the words, but it was a stern commitment to keep the system PRIVATE.
Keeping the system " private" is of course what the drug companies and HMO's want. Same for the advertisting industry. But with Bush and others on the Right, it's also about their deeply-held "freemarket ideology." They have this belief that the "private sector" is, by definition, ALWAYS better.
I wonder if the "private sector" would fight as well in Iraq as our troops do, even though they're paid one-third of what private security contractors earn, many of whom scurry at the first sign of a firefight. This inbalance alone has had a debilitating effect on our troops' morale! And what about our Veteran's Administration hospital system. Our government-run VA Hospitals are ranked among the best in the country by the experts.
I believe in "free enterprise" by the way. I think it's the most efficient way to deliver goods and services.
But it does not work in healthcare. We need a government-run healthcare system that provides a
basic level of care to
all citizens. Yes, taxes will be higher, but the net effect will be less spent on healthcare overall.
The U.S. spends a higher percentage on healthcare "administration" than any other industrialized country because our system (if we can call it a system) is so cumbersome and complicated. Look at the recent drug benefit program, designed to mainly benefit the drug companies, if you need an example. Add to that the 'PROFITS' that pharmaceuticals and HMOs need to make to stay in business. (By the way, I don't criticize the drug companies and HMOs. They have to play by the rules of the system. It's the "system" that needs to be changed).
Then there's the ridiculous cost of 'MARKETING'. It's a fact that tThe drug companies spend more on marketing than on research! Do we really need them persuading us to "Ask your doctor about Lipitor" before they even tell us what Lipitor is? (I didn't even know what Lipitor was for a full year after first hearing the commercial).
It's not just the influcence of the profit-driven Healthcare Industry that is to blame. Right Wing Conservatives have this ideology that says "government can't do anything right." Their long-term and oft-stated mission is to "starve the beast" by squeezing funding. They say "let the private sector do it." Could they be wrong in the case of healthcare? The evidence that they ARE wrong grows stronger all the time. Being second only to Latvia is just the latest piece of evidence.
By the way, I work for the UCSD School of Medicine, which includes a "state-run" medical center that is second to none. So I know first-hand that we don't need the "profit-motive" in order to deliver good healthcare.